Skip to the page
StrategyGradeLibraryGurusLearnPricing

StrategyGrade

The backtest the video didn't show you. Every trade, every assumption and every check, on the record.

Product

  • New autopsy
  • Library
  • Gurus
  • Graveyard
  • Requests
  • Learn
  • Accuracy
  • Our data
  • Pricing
  • Test your idea
  • Paper trading
  • Compare
  • Developers

The fine print

Hypothetical simulated results with the limitations of CFD data feeds. Education, not investment advice. Every report discloses its assumptions and controls.

TermsPrivacy

← All report cards
F
Channel report card

JadeCap

None of the 2 tested strategies held up, and claimed win rates ran 31 points above what we measured.

Strategies tested
2 of 2 videos
Held up in our tests
0
Winning trades: claimed → real
70%→39%
Average money per trade
−$2.79

Every video we tested

  • YouTubeLOSES MONEYNQRevealing the ICT Asian Range Strategy That Makes $10K+/WeekJadeCap31% win−$6.10 per trade*2,337 trades
  • YouTubeNO BETTER THAN LUCKNQSimple ICT Silver Bullet Strategy | 70% Win RateJadeCap70%→39%+$0.51 per trade*3,072 trades
resultvideomarketwinning trades: claimed → real$ per trade*tradesaccount
YouTubeLOSES MONEYRevealing the ICT Asian Range Strategy That Makes $10K+/WeekJadeCapNQnone→31%−$6.102,337
YouTubeNO BETTER THAN LUCKSimple ICT Silver Bullet Strategy | 70% Win RateJadeCapNQ70%→39%+$0.513,072

* dollars made or lost per trade on a $10,000 position, after trading costs. Green = a profit that passed our checks. Black = a profit we could not tell from luck. Grey = too few trades to trust.

The grade rates the strategies as taught in this channel's videos (including any guests), tested on our data with realistic costs. It is not a judgement of any person, and it only covers the videos listed here. Money figures are per trade on a $10,000 position, after costs. Made one of these videos and think we read it wrong? Open the report and use "Did we read the rules right?" or "Flag this autopsy".